-
20-10-2007, 01:26 #1
UT3 : Post je UT3 demo benchmarks!
Omdat het iedereen interesseert (mij dus) zou het leuk zijn als verschillende mensen hier hen benchmarks poste.
[EDIT] nieuwere, snellere manier om te benchen
Om te beginnen maak een kopie van u orginele UTEngine.ini (\Mijn documenten\My Games\Unreal Tournament 3 Demo\UTGame\Config),
start de ut3 demo zodat het een nieuwe UTEngine.ini aanmaakt.
Zorg ervoor dat Texture Detail en World Detail op 5 staan.
Verander in de nieuwe UTEngine.ini bSmoothFrameRate=TRUE naar FALSE
Download dit UT3 benchmark programma.
Als een benchmark klaar is klik op results en kopieer de voorlaatste regel van de .txt file en post ze hier (met u specs indien nodig).
Om te beginnen dit zijn mijn benchies:
CPU: AMD Athlon64 4800+
MEM: 2GB DDR400
GFX: Geforce 7900GT TOP
UT3 benchmark settings:
bots: 12 - time in sec: 60 - 1024x768, geen sound
DM-HeatRay_fly
3982 frames collected over 59.23 seconds, disregarding 0.01 seconds for a 67.24 FPS average
DM-HeatRay_bot
2885 frames collected over 59.63 seconds, disregarding 0.04 seconds for a 48.41 FPS average
DM-ShangriLa_fly
3762 frames collected over 59.20 seconds, disregarding 0.03 seconds for a 63.57 FPS average
DM-ShangriLa_bot
3002 frames collected over 59.52 seconds, disregarding 0.03 seconds for a 50.46 FPS average
vCTF-Suspense_fly
3414 frames collected over 59.48 seconds, disregarding 0.01 seconds for a 57.41 FPS average
vCTF-Suspense_bot
2478 frames collected over 59.61 seconds, disregarding 0.01 seconds for a 41.58 FPS average
UT3 benchmark settings:
bots: 12 - time in sec: 60 - 1680x1050, geen sound
DM-HeatRay_fly
1994 frames collected over 59.48 seconds, disregarding 0.01 seconds for a 33.53 FPS average
DM-HeatRay_bot
1613 frames collected over 59.65 seconds, disregarding 0.03 seconds for a 27.05 FPS average
DM-ShangriLa_fly
1929 frames collected over 59.22 seconds, disregarding 0.05 seconds for a 32.60 FPS average
DM-ShangriLa_bot
1679 frames collected over 59.54 seconds, disregarding 0.03 seconds for a 28.22 FPS average
vCTF-Suspense_fly
1721 frames collected over 59.51 seconds, disregarding 0.03 seconds for a 28.93 FPS average
vCTF-Suspense_bot
1502 frames collected over 59.58 seconds, disregarding 0.03 seconds for a 25.22 FPS averageLast edited by Morrigu; 20-10-2007 at 20:02.
waky waky hands of snaky!no votes
-
-
20-10-2007, 02:18 #2
DM-HeatRay
29694 frames collected over 204.37 seconds, disregarding 0.02 seconds for a 145.31 FPS average, 99.81 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
DM-ShangriLa
20663 frames collected over 167.60 seconds, disregarding 0.02 seconds for a 123.31 FPS average, 99.78 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
cpu: Core 2 Duo E6700
ram: 2048 Mb DDR2 800
gfx: 8800gtx
Er waren wel bots bij mij
Kweetnie of dat uitmaakt
no votes
-
20-10-2007, 04:05 #3
maakt veel uit ja ;p
bots vrage cpuwaky waky hands of snaky!no votes
-
20-10-2007, 15:21 #4
hoe doe je die bots dan weg want die benchmark start toch automatish op?
no votes
-
20-10-2007, 18:23 #5
heb vandaag dit benchmark programmake gevonde via google
UT3 benchmark prog
pak simpeler zowaky waky hands of snaky!no votes
-
20-10-2007, 19:20 #6
Test op 1024x768, no sound, 12-60, vista dus zal wel in directx10 gerunned zijn?
CPU: T7300
MEM: 2GB DDR2 667mhz
GPU: HD 2600 mobile (300 core/400 mem)
DM-HeatRay_fly
3166 frames collected over 59.44 seconds, disregarding 0.00 seconds for a 53.26 FPS average, 94.74 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
DM-HeatRay_bot
3207 frames collected over 59.57 seconds, disregarding 0.00 seconds for a 53.84 FPS average, 97.53 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
DM-ShangriLa_fly
3035 frames collected over 59.46 seconds, disregarding 0.00 seconds for a 51.05 FPS average, 94.25 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
DM-ShangriLa_bot
2485 frames collected over 59.54 seconds, disregarding 0.00 seconds for a 41.74 FPS average, 83.42 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
vCTF-Suspense_fly
3280 frames collected over 59.44 seconds, disregarding 0.00 seconds for a 55.18 FPS average, 98.03 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
vCTF-Suspense_bot
2737 frames collected over 59.54 seconds, disregarding 0.00 seconds for a 45.97 FPS average, 84.61 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
edit: was met bsmoothframerate=true, zal later wel is opnieuw me false doenno votes
-
20-10-2007, 19:22 #7
DM-Shangrila:
- 12 bots: 5952 frames collected over 59.06 seconds, disregarding 0.01 seconds for a 100.79 FPS average, 99.78 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
Average GPU frame time: 0.00 ms
- Flyby: 7596 frames collected over 59.07 seconds, disregarding 0.01 seconds for a 128.63 FPS average, 99.93 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
Average GPU frame time: 0.00 ms
DM-HeatRay:
- 12 bots: 7321 frames collected over 59.07 seconds, disregarding 0.01 seconds for a 123.96 FPS average, 99.74 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
Average GPU frame time: 0.00 ms
- Flyby: 8762 frames collected over 59.05 seconds, disregarding 0.01 seconds for a 148.39 FPS average, 100.00 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
Average GPU frame time: 0.00 ms
Geen tweaks in ini ofzo om blur/field of depth weg te werken. Resolutie was 1440x900.
Core 2 Quad Q6600 @3.4Ghz
Corsair Twinx Matched 4GB @907mhz
Geforce 8800GTXno votes
-
20-10-2007, 19:50 #8
DM-HeatRay
- 12 bots :6610 frames collected over 59.08 seconds, disregarding 0.00 seconds for a 111.90 FPS average, 99.60 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
Flyby: 6580 frames collected over 59.04 seconds, disregarding 0.00 seconds for a 111.45 FPS average, 99.92 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
DM-Shangrila
- 12 bots :6121 frames collected over 58.24 seconds, disregarding 0.01 seconds for a 105.11 FPS average, 99.67 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
Flyby: 6785 frames collected over 59.08 seconds, disregarding 0.01 seconds for a 114.88 FPS average, 99.92 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
Kheb dus zelfde resolutie gepakt als Corrupt^ 1440x900.
raar dat ik 5fps meer heb op DM-Shangrila met bots.
mja geluk had zekers?
no votes
-
21-10-2007, 14:17 #9
wtf is "benchmark" ?
no votes
-
21-10-2007, 14:51 #10
prestatie van uw computer.
aantal frames je hebt zoals we hier aantonen.no votes
-
21-10-2007, 15:27 #11Member
- Registered
- 20/07/02
- Location
- Roeselare
- Posts
- 1,987
- iTrader
- 8 (100%)
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Reputation
- 0/0
een benchmark helpt je om prestaties met mekaar te vergelijken...
een benchmark is een soort genormaliseerde testopstelling waarvan de resultaten rechtstreeks vergelijkbaar zijn met mekaar
dit geeft een duidelijk beeld met betrekking tot de verschillen in rekenkracht van de computer... kloksnelheid, ram en grafische kaart zegt niet zoveel, de resultaten van een benchmark welno votes
-
21-10-2007, 15:32 #12Approved 9liver
- Registered
- 14/04/07
- Location
- Ieper / Leuven
- Posts
- 3,717
- iTrader
- 29 (94%)
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Reputation
- 1/9
Dumping FPS chart at 2007.10.21-14.32.07 using build 3464 built from changelist 198460
Bucket: 0 - 5 Time: 0.00 Frame: 0.00
Bucket: 5 - 10 Time: 0.23 Frame: 0.03
Bucket: 10 - 15 Time: 0.00 Frame: 0.00
Bucket: 15 - 20 Time: 0.10 Frame: 0.03
Bucket: 20 - 25 Time: 0.07 Frame: 0.03
Bucket: 25 - 30 Time: 0.26 Frame: 0.11
Bucket: 30 - 35 Time: 0.05 Frame: 0.03
Bucket: 35 - 40 Time: 0.09 Frame: 0.06
Bucket: 40 - 45 Time: 0.50 Frame: 0.34
Bucket: 45 - 50 Time: 0.25 Frame: 0.20
Bucket: 50 - 55 Time: 0.74 Frame: 0.62
Bucket: 55 - 60 Time: 1.17 Frame: 1.10
Bucket: 60 - 99 Time: 96.54 Frame: 97.45
3531 frames collected over 57.51 seconds, disregarding 0.01 seconds for a 61.41 FPS average, 99.34 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
Average GPU frame time: 0.00 ms

e6600
8800gts niet overclocked
2gb ramPC : i7 920 / Asus P6T Se / 3x2gb Ocz Reaper 1888mhz / Ocz Vertex 2 64gb / 500gb WD / Sapphire 6850
Laptop: Msi FX720 / i5-2410M / 6gb / 750gbno votes
-
21-10-2007, 16:00 #13Approved 9liver
- Registered
- 12/01/03
- Location
- Winksele (Herent)
- Posts
- 9,782
- iTrader
- 40 (100%)
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Reputation
- 13/63
'k zou toch vsync afzetten om te benchen..
Education costs money, but then so does ignorance.no votes
-
21-10-2007, 17:36 #14Approved 9liver
- Registered
- 13/12/05
- Location
- Zwevegem
- Posts
- 7,087
- iTrader
- 4 (100%)
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Reputation
- 0/50
no votes
-
21-10-2007, 19:53 #15Member
- Registered
- 06/05/03
- Location
- Gent
- Posts
- 5,088
- iTrader
- 74 (100%)
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Reputation
- 7/28
Met fps cap 62 aan:
Dumping FPS chart at 2007.10.24-18.52.48 using build 3464 built from changelist 198460
Bucket: 0 - 5 Time: 0.84 Frame: 0.05
Bucket: 5 - 10 Time: 1.41 Frame: 0.28
Bucket: 10 - 15 Time: 1.00 Frame: 0.33
Bucket: 15 - 20 Time: 1.61 Frame: 0.75
Bucket: 20 - 25 Time: 1.86 Frame: 1.13
Bucket: 25 - 30 Time: 6.35 Frame: 4.90
Bucket: 30 - 35 Time: 25.10 Frame: 22.44
Bucket: 35 - 40 Time: 31.48 Frame: 32.58
Bucket: 40 - 45 Time: 20.03 Frame: 23.06
Bucket: 45 - 50 Time: 4.30 Frame: 5.56
Bucket: 50 - 55 Time: 3.56 Frame: 5.14
Bucket: 55 - 60 Time: 2.45 Frame: 3.77
Bucket: 60 - 99 Time: 0.00 Frame: 0.00
2121 frames collected over 59.20 seconds, disregarding 1.14 seconds for a 36.53 FPS average, 86.92 percent of time spent > 30 FPS
Average GPU frame time: 0.00 ms
Comp in sig. Meestal zettek cap op 30 en dan blijft hij daar constant aan spelen, met cap op unlimited zie ik toch wel zware framedrops soms en spelen op constante 30 fps is dan toch veel aangenamer.no votes


